![]() ![]() It can remain invisible at its current location. I like the third method best because we don’t necessarily have to position the checkbox off the screen for our use case. We don’t want to use the first two methods because a screen reader won’t be able to read the default checkbox. Here is an interesting article that covers some of these methods. Position it off the screen using position: absolute and an insanely big value like left: -9999px.Step 1: Hiding the default checkbox without losing accessibilityīecause we can’t style the default checkbox using CSS, we need to hide it. The reasons for these requirements will be explained in Step 3 of this article. The for attribute is required on the label.The following things are required to make the checkbox work: checkbox wrapper is to encapsulate the input and label so that we know this chunk of the markup represents a checkbox. I will demonstrate a solution for checkboxes here, but radio buttons use the same approach with slightly different styles. So let’s get started! We will use the following:Īlmost all browsers (IE 10 and above) have good support for the three items above. ![]() But I did find a simple solution that doesn’t compromise the look and feel, and maintains accessibility. I also found that using any one of the above solutions doesn’t give me the look and feel that I want. In addition, very few of these solutions focus on accessibility. But most of these solutions have issues of their own or are not consistent across all browsers. There are several solutions for getting around this problem using things such as vendor prefixes, background images, unicode characters, and icon fonts. If you stick with the default options, they look different on different browsers. If you are reading this article, you know that adding custom styles to default checkboxes and radio buttons using just CSS is a pain. Pure CSS: Accessible Checkboxes and Radios Buttons ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |